In some countries, owing a house rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might this can be the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?

In certain countries,

people

are giving more preference to earning a

house

instead

of renting. In

this

case, the community get more freedom to construct their own homes to their taste.

Besides

, they do not want to face problems like finding another accommodation when the

owner

of the

house

asks them to leave.

Therefore

,

this

is a positive situation. society are likely to own a residence. The obvious reason for

this

case is that

while

constructing the home with their own cash, they can design their

house

as per their wish. They have the right to add more facilities

as well as

to reduce. In the case of a rented

house

,

people

need to adjust to that

house

. They cannot do anything without the permission of the owners.

Besides

the

house

proprietor provide some restriction for the family who live there. For ,instance if the render does anything devastating, the holder should charge some money for that.

Thus

,

people

do not get any freedom. In some places, the landowner allows

people

to leave their dwelling for a particular time period. After that, they should find some other accommodation.

In other words

, the

owner

maybe thinks that if

people

leave there for a long time. They have to think that the

house

is theirs. So the

owner

changes

people

annually.

As a result

, the residents should leave the

house

when the

owner

asked for it.

Moreover

, the rate of a

house

can be increased by the

owner

at any time.

Then

the

people

have no right to minimise the cost. They owe money to the owners if there is any gap occurs in the payment. So that

this

all leads to a traumatic experience.

To conclude

, when

people

leave a rented

house

there are some reasons which makes adverse effects. So it is better to own a

house

rather than rent one.