Traditional games are more useful than modern games in developing children’s skills. do you agree or disagree?

Games

are proven to be effective to improve children's skills. Some people believe that traditional

games

are more effective compared to modern

games

,

while

others argue the opposite.

However

, based on my point of view, I believe that traditional

ones

are more useful than modern

ones

. If we consider traditional

games

such

as "dice game", it involves many individuals. These activities enhance a lot of soft skills among little

ones

,

such

as leadership, communication, sharing, caring etc. Not only that

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

but

also

, it makes them more social. They learn how to deal with the society.

Further

, they get to know that they can not win every time, and sometimes they have to fail. They may not depress by little things, once they reach to young age.

Further

, they may end up with many friends when they were occupied in these activities.

On the other hand

, the modern

ones

are mostly individual activities.

Also

, most of the time, digital technology is involved. Children are addicted to these easily and forget the whole world. They lose the importance of bonds and relationships. So many cases have been reported globally, which report psychological issues made by these addictions to children. In conclusion, I believe that traditional

games

are still valuable to the society.

Further

, juniors can experience positive things and learn good skills from them. Parents should involve their sons and/or daughter in these to enhance their quality of life.

This

will be a good investment for their future and it will produce a healthy future generation.