Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

The area that government should invest in is a topic of ongoing debate. Some

people

argue that

railways

are the field that governments should spend

money

on rather than

roads

, and I agree with

this

statement because of two compelling reasons.

To begin

with, developing

railways

is more beneficial to conserve the environment.

This

is because it enables more

people

to use subways and trains, leading to a decrease in the number of private cars on the

roads

.

Then

, a declining trend occurs not solely in carbon emissions like fumes and carbon dioxide but in the possibility of traffic jams.

For example

, after the Korean government invested

money

in improving

railways

, the number of passengers who use subways rose constantly.

Moreover

, spending

money

on

railways

has benefits for more citizens,

while

developing

roads

are only useful for car owners. The governments spend tax revenues improving something, so individuals' needs are undeniable. More

people

will require the administration to invest

money

in

railways

. A recent survey conducted by the government revealed that 74% of participants said the administration should take prioritize enhancing

railways

rather than

roads

.

This

demonstrates that the railway field is essential to get investment. In conclusion, it is evident that

while

roads

have advantages for limited

people

, spending

money

on

railways

is imperative not only for most citizens but for the environment.

Thus

, I firmly believe that governments should take precedence in developing

railways

.