Many people think that land in the city should be used for residence while others think that we should use land for parks and community places. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

The majority of

people

believe that

land

in the province should be used for residence

while

some

people

think that these areas should be used to construct public

places

. Both of these two purposes have their own upsides and downsides and

this

essay will discuss more detail about

this

argument.

First,

the spending

area

for the social public is completely justifiable because it is the place to improve citizens’ health.

For example

, every morning, older

people

often go to the park to walk, exercise or meditate in order to be healthier and keep calm.

Moreover

, these social

places

also

are the

area

for children to play after school. They go to these areas for entertainment purposes

such

as widening their circle of friends, skating and wandering to reduce strains from school.

Secondly

, it is the best place to operate social

activities

. A

city

has many

activities

to do

such

as exhibitions, volunteering

activities

and many other important

activities

of the

city

so it is too reasonable to have some public

places

in a

city

. First and foremost, using

land

in the

city

to build condos and houses helps citizens have more

places

to live. It can be seen that

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

the population and the citizens in urban areas are increasing day by day which leads to inadequate housing so it is very necessary to have a large

area

that can establish apartments and ground houses.

Thus

,

this

work can support

people

even penniless

people

still have a place to live.

Secondly

, condos are the best manner to save the

area

in the

city

. Nowadays, apartments tend to be constructed up to 70 floors and each floor has about 13-18 rooms with an

area

that is

suitable for a nuclear family. Because of that reason, the

city

will have more

land

to build public construction

such

as parks, walking streets and so on. In conclusion, each purpose has its own benefits but I prefer to choose using

land

for residence because of its convenience and space saving. And

according to

the aforementioned analysis, if a

city

chooses to use

land

for housing purposes, they still have enough

area

to construct social

places

and it may be the choice that brings the most merits for the

city

's citizens.