Many people think that land in the city should be used for residence while others think that we should use land for parks and community places. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
The majority of
people
believe that
land
in the province should be used for residence
while
some
people
think that these areas should be used to construct public
places
. Both of these two purposes have their own upsides and downsides and
this
essay will discuss more detail about
this
argument.
First,
the spending
area
for the social public is completely justifiable because it is the place to improve citizens’ health.
For example
, every morning, older
people
often go to the park to walk, exercise or meditate in order to be healthier and keep calm.
Moreover
, these social
places
also
are the
area
for children to play after school. They go to these areas for entertainment purposes
such
as widening their circle of friends, skating and wandering to reduce strains from school.
Secondly
, it is the best place to operate social
activities
. A
city
has many
activities
to do
such
as exhibitions, volunteering
activities
and many other important
activities
of the
city
so it is too reasonable to have some public
places
in a
city
. First and foremost, using
land
in the
city
to build condos and houses helps citizens have more
places
to live. It can be seen that
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
the population and the citizens in urban areas are increasing day by day which leads to inadequate housing so it is very necessary to have a large
area
that can establish apartments and ground houses.
Thus
,
this
work can support
people
even penniless
people
still have a place to live.
Secondly
, condos are the best manner to save the
area
in the
city
. Nowadays, apartments tend to be constructed up to 70 floors and each floor has about 13-18 rooms with an
area
that is
suitable for a nuclear family. Because of that reason, the
city
will have more
land
to build public construction
such
as parks, walking streets and so on. In conclusion, each purpose has its own benefits but I prefer to choose using
land
for residence because of its convenience and space saving. And
according to
the aforementioned analysis, if a
city
chooses to use
land
for housing purposes, they still have enough
area
to construct social
places
and it may be the choice that brings the most merits for the
city
's citizens.
Submitted by maianhdt12 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • residential buildings
  • housing shortage
  • green spaces
  • urban populations
  • living costs
  • recreational space
  • quality of life
  • economic benefits
  • public health
  • well-being
  • mixed-use developments
  • reduce healthcare costs
  • environmental impact
  • improving air quality
  • sustainable city planning
What to do next:
Look at other essays: