people say that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see artwork and historical objects by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree?

There is a controversy about the need for public
museums
and
art
galleries
since the invention of computers and virtual tours for seeing artworks and historical
objects
. I disagree with the idea that computers will substitute the roles of
museums
and
art
galleries
. In my opinion, even though the development of the Internet and related technologies, it is not possible for virtual tours to replace a lot of expressions of seeing artworks and
objects
in person. First of all, it would be quite different for audiences or visitors to see the arts with their eyes directly compared to the view from appreciating the
objects
through the monitors. They can not feel the exact textures, colours, and smells through the computers. They will only be able to get detailed information about the
objects
and artists but not the expressions and feelings from the artist's brushes. The only way to appreciate the beauty of
art
is to see it through your eyes, touch, and heart.
Secondly
, people will not only the exhibition itself but the atmosphere and noises of the
galleries
and
museums
.
While
appreciating historical
objects
and pictures, we
also
absorb the mood and the music of our circumstances.
This
is why sound and sights would be one of the most crucial elements of
art
like movies and orchestras. We can feel those things in different ways through our life, ages, and the very emotion and mood in the moments.
Furthermore
,
galleries
provide us with the space for discussion and sharing of information and emotions. There are various methods for people to appreciate artistic and historical things but a majority of people want to have conversations about the exhibition and share their feelings. For these reasons, I think there are a lot of important roles in
art
galleries
and public
museums
which can not be replaced by the Internet and the state of
art
digital technologies and those places will be necessary in the future for our descendants too.
Submitted by ibicf5697 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+

Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.
Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!
What to do next:
Look at other essays: