Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the government pays some or all of the costs. Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages?

In recent decades, the question of whether the government should pay for

children

has been receiving a great deal of public attention.

Although

this

assistance is not without disadvantages, the upsides will be far more significant. On the one hand, there are a number of drawbacks to

this

sponsorship.

First,

since sustainable development of a country requires to have many investments in different fields, paying all costs for the education of

children

can put more burden on the national budget. In fact, the authority

need

Change the verb form

needs

show examples

to allocate funds for many key areas,

such

as the health care system and infrastructures, which means that every citizen should shoulder the responsibility to pay their

children

’s tuition and fee.

Second,

by supporting the cost of literacy for

children

from national treasure, the authorities could create unfairness for childless people.

This

means that they may feel angry or irritated if knowing that their taxes are not spent on their benefits.

On the other hand

, there are some advantages when the learning costs of

children

are backed up by the government.

First,

in order to prepare for labour forces in the future, a country should invest more in scholarships ,especially for very young ages.

This

means that

children

who have strong knowledge will become qualified employees later, which helps national economics develop by levelling productivity.

Second,

if the government supports

children

’s education, every child will have the chance to go to school and gain knowledge.

Therefore

, illiteracy and social crimes will be diminished, which bring prosperity to the country. In conclusion,

although

the sponsorship for the education of kids is not without disadvantages, the benefit was far more justified.