some people believe who make a lot of mooney are more successfull while other believe that individuals who contribute to society like scientist and teachers are more successful. Discuss both the views and give your opnion.

It is often argued by a few masses who make a chunk of

money

are more victorious.

However

, others opine that people who are benefactors like scientists and mentors are more successful.

This

essay will discuss both views as far as I am concerned I am in favour of the latter notion. To commence with, individuals who earn high incomes are the most successful.To explain , because of running large businesses or occupying high ,positions many masses earn high amounts of

money

per month which not only make them lavish lifestyle but

also

assist them in being popular.

For instance

, a headline from BBC( British broadcasting corporation) revealed that Elon Musk, chief executive of Tesla is the wealthiest person in the world which makes him more successful and well-known.

As a result

, It is proved that

money

makes people able to be successful and well-known in the world. Shifting towards the final view of why contributing to society is the best way to be victorious

due to

social respect and vast knowledge.

In other words

, professionals

such

as scientists and teacher do more efforts in their domain to enhance their knowledge

as well as

they do work for the community

due to

this

they attain respect from the public

along with

authority. To cite an example, Dr, Abdul Kalam known as the missile man of India contributed not only to science but

also

served as the 11th president of India by which he became a well-known person in the world,

Hence

, It is an indisputable fact that the community helpers are more successful. In conclusion,

although

,

money

or social contribution should be considered as the criteria to assess yet I believe the benefactors of society are more successful

due to

their social respect and vast knowledge.