Research has shown that the transportation of products and people are the main source of pollution. Some people believe government should be in charge of this, while others believe it is the fault of individuals. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Research indicates that the transportation of products and humans are responsible for the highest levels of
pollution
on the planet.
While
some
people
argue that the government should take charge of
this
matter, I believe that individuals should
also
share the responsibility. In
this
essay, I will discuss both views and state my opinion.
In
Change preposition
On
show examples
the one hand, there are many compelling reasons why governments should be in charge of
this
. Air
pollution
from transportation is a result of ineffective government policy. Some governments do not limit the number of
vehicles
on the roads, leading to heavy traffic congestion in large cities.
For example
, in Hanoi city, there is a lot of population, leading to a large number of
vehicles
, and
this
causes serious air
pollution
due to
a large amount of toxic gas emitted from those
vehicles
.
In
Change preposition
On
show examples
the other hand, each individual should be the one in charge of activities that have adverse impacts on the environment.Many
people
, especially those in developing countries, have little awareness of the limitations of using personal
vehicles
such
as cars and motorbikes. They are able to take buses and subways or other public transport
instead
of driving, which could reduce the amount of exhaust fumes from
vehicles
.
However
, there is still a large part of
people
who choose personal
vehicles
due to
convenience. For that reason, individuals are
also
responsible for adverse effects on the environment. In conclusion, the transportation of products and
people
are
Correct subject-verb agreement
is
show examples
the main cause of air
pollution
around the world
therefore
, both
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
national leaders and citizens should join hands together to lower the negative impact of all kinds of transport.
Submitted by anhnguhongmai on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
The essay discusses both views and provides a clear opinion, but the arguments lack depth and specific examples. Work on providing more detailed and concrete examples to support your points.
coherence and cohesion
The logical structure of the essay is generally good, with clear introduction and conclusion. However, the development of ideas within paragraphs could be improved for better coherence.

Use a variety of complex and simple sentences

You should use complex sentences in your writing, but it does not mean that you should try to make all of our sentences complex.

‘Complex’ sentences are not actually very complex; they are just two or more simple sentences put together. Putting them together makes the essay more coherent and cohesive.

Examples:

I really want to study but I’m too tired.

I wore a warm coat because the weather was cold.

If action is not taken soon on climate change, global warming will get worse.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • emissions standards
  • public transportation
  • green technologies
  • environmentally friendly choices
  • carpooling
  • electric vehicles
  • market demand
  • infrastructure
  • recycling programs
  • policies and regulations
  • investment
  • innovate
  • compelling industries
What to do next:
Look at other essays: