In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might this be the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?

In many nations, buying a home is more crucial than renting. Some argue that it is

due to

living in

one

region permanently and a sense of belonging.

However

, I believe that

this

position has more drawbacks than outcomes. Many individuals around the globe would like to stay in a specific area as long as they can. Most probably it is because

people

want to create a good bond in the neighbourhood.

This

situation forces them to consume money to own a home

instead

of renting. Despite the fact that the difficulties that

people

face, still many of them try to buy a place. A tangible example can be given from the

Blacksea

Correct your spelling

Black sea

region of Turkey where almost all of the relatives of

one

family applied for bank credit to live in a close neighbourhood.

People

tend to believe that buying a home has considerable benefits,

however

, I strongly believe that it is a waste of money. Recently, inflation has increased dramatically which results in the high cost of homes. For that reason, without a doubt,

people

should not pay just for

one

building for the whole of their life.

Nevertheless

, I tend to believe that renting a place is far more beneficial in terms of balancing the budget.

For instance

, many men and women in İzmir prefer to become a tenant to reduce the figures of expenditures in the

last

year.

In addition

, they could have a chance to get a satisfactory relaxed holiday. If anybody chooses to become a landlord, they would have to pay a bank credit for decades and can not afford for holiday. In conclusion, the major reason that being a landlord is more likely to stay in

one

place for whole life. But I disagree with

this

view because I would like to discover the globe with

this

money rather than stay in

one

region.