It is now convinient for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do you agree or disagree with this development?

Travelling to an isolated environment
for instance
south
Pole
, is currently convenient for scientists and tourists , it is more interesting than other tourism or discoveries I ultimately. Agree with
this
improvement .
Firstly
, the South
Pole
remains an unknown place
although
there are documentaries that illustrate an overview of
this
place , if an increasing number of people visit it
this
would influence others to discover
such
virgin sites
in other words
South
Pole
offers a tremendous opportunity to see penguins in their natural environment
as well as
icebergs it is a unique experience that each one of us should witness at least once in our lives , rather than visiting well-known countries
such
as France, Italy or Spain . As a result ,
this
will decrease the massive tourisme in notorious cities
such
as Venisia, Paris and New York
Secondly
, if individuals travel to the South
Pole
this
will improve their awareness of global warm , as it is tangible since the melting of glaciers is conspicuous , they will witness the impact of humanity on nature which can be abstract in urban areas since people are distracted by the crowd of the cities ,
for example
in the South
Pole
the saltwater gets mangled into freshwater which reduces the worldwide resources,
as a result
, individuals will take immediate action in order to reduce global warming.
Thirdly
getting more researchers involved in isolated areas around the world will enhance global insight into those sites , in ,fact scientists will implement studies on different aspects of those environments
for instance
as I have never been to the South
Pole
I don't have a clear idea of what it seems like to live there , So if experts make researchers they will better inform us . In conclusion, visiting remote environments enhances individual’s concerning climate
as well as
reduces massive tourism around the world
Submitted by tatissiw13 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • advanced technology
  • transportation
  • remote natural environments
  • ecosystems
  • environmental degradation
  • wildlife habitats
  • conservation
  • ecological footprint
  • biodiversity
  • sustainable practices
  • ethical debates
What to do next:
Look at other essays: