Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees, while others have free entry. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages?

With the increasing popularity of museums and art galleries, whether they should be free of charge or not has drawn much discussion amongst the general public. I believe that the merits of charging for

entry

outweigh the drawbacks. One of the cogent reasons for charging

fees

is that they can help pay for building and maintenance

costs

.

This

is because charging a reasonable

entry

fee

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

can help cover the cost incurred

as a result

of day-to-day activities

such

as utility bills, maintenance

costs

, renovation, and staff

costs

. If these

costs

were not covered the state of the facilities would deteriorate and be less attractive. An additional benefit of entrance

fees

is that they allow these places to buy new exhibits to attract more people.

This

means that the

fees

benefit museum attendees by constantly improving the quality of these places.

Consequently

, charging an admission fee seems very utilitarian

to

Change preposition

for

show examples

creating better museums and galleries.

However

, there are downsides associated with admission

fees

, one of which is that it may preclude some members of the community from entering the facilities.

This

is particularly the case for poor members of society who may be unable to afford the

entry

price. It seems a great pity if children and economically disadvantaged people are unable to benefit from the cultural experiences these venues provide. In conclusion, the benefits of an

entry

fee, in terms of funding maintenance and expansion surpass the downsides

such

as limited access for the poor.

Furthermore

, the risk to impoverished members of society can be mitigated by offering heavily discounted

entry

to them.