Introduction
It is argued that having the sole administration to govern all countries should be more beneficial than possessing distinct management for each nation.
Although
establishing a global government provides a better and unrestricted movement among states, I believe that diverse polities should be maintained to protect cultural identity; Linking Words
therefore
, the benefits of owning an independent government for every commonwealth surpass its drawbacks.
Linking Words
Body · 1
If the sole administration manages all countries, open borders would be allowed among whole nations.
In other words
, travelling to a different state would be more convenient with no requirement for VISA and customs. Linking Words
For example
, Bhutan, India, and Nepal share open borders with each other; Linking Words
consequently
, their citizens visit these territories independently without additional tariffs. Linking Words
However
, I consider that having open boundaries should not be considered a great advantage because immigrants should still pass through smooth control for security.
Linking Words
Body · 2
The drawback of supporting the presence of alone polity is damaging
a
cultural identity of a commonwealth. Correct article usage
the
This
is to say that every country is administered in a distinct particular way, but generalizing these methods for all states would be contradictory. Linking Words
For instance
, Thais and Saudis accept being managed by their kings, Linking Words
in contrast
; the majority of other commonwealths are governed by presidents. Linking Words
Hence
, I believe that every nation should have discrete administration, responsible for its different traditions and rules.
Linking Words
Conclusion
In conclusion, establishing a single polity can alleviate the conditions and terms to travel to other communities;
nonetheless
, the downsides of losing cultural identity far outweigh the upsides.Linking Words