It is argued that having the sole administration to govern all countries should be more beneficial than possessing distinct management for each nation.
Although
establishing a global government provides a better and unrestricted movement among states, I believe that diverse polities should be maintained to protect cultural identity; Linking Words
therefore
, the benefits of owning an independent government for every commonwealth surpass its drawbacks.
If the sole administration manages all countries, open borders would be allowed among whole nations. Linking Words
In other words
, travelling to a different state would be more convenient with no requirement for VISA and customs. Linking Words
For example
, Bhutan, India, and Nepal share open borders with each other; Linking Words
consequently
, their citizens visit these territories independently without additional tariffs. Linking Words
However
, I consider that having open boundaries should not be considered a great advantage because immigrants should still pass through smooth control for security.
The drawback of supporting the presence of alone polity is damaging Linking Words
a
cultural identity of a commonwealth. Correct article usage
the
This
is to say that every country is administered in a distinct particular way, but generalizing these methods for all states would be contradictory. Linking Words
For instance
, Thais and Saudis accept being managed by their kings, Linking Words
in contrast
; the majority of other commonwealths are governed by presidents. Linking Words
Hence
, I believe that every nation should have discrete administration, responsible for its different traditions and rules.
In conclusion, establishing a single polity can alleviate the conditions and terms to travel to other communities; Linking Words
nonetheless
, the downsides of losing cultural identity far outweigh the upsides.Linking Words
murad.tariverdiyev2005