In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

With the world in

such

environmental

Correct article usage

an environmental

show examples

crisis and economic turmoil, many

people

choose to read online

instead

of spending money on printed stuff. Personally, I believe that online reading is preferable to reading physical papers.

Firstly

, we should consider the potential negatives of free online reading. A major negative of

this

debate is that it would cut the income of writers, journalists, photographers and etc. If nobody pays for reading, all these occupations will meet

a

Remove the article

apply

show examples

great damage.

In addition

, it is said that

people

normally do not appreciate the value of free services.

For instance

, if you spend money on something you will use it better than earning it freely.

On the other hand

, free online reading has got many advantages. First of all, reading online saves more trees and it is really good for our planet. The next positive is easy accessibility. I mean all

people

have access to online news and e-books and

this

would lead to improving society’s awareness.

Furthermore

, online reading could broaden your horizons.

For instance

, you can read newspapers from all over the world,

while

in the past

people

were just able to read local newspapers. These days everybody can read the news even if it belongs to another country or nation and

consequently

,

this

would improve the public’s general knowledge about other countries and cultures.

To conclude

, I feel that the benefits of online reading outweigh its negatives, as long the occupations related to

this

kind of media don’t get hurt. In my point of view, in the near future,

people

will completely emit physical newspapers and books, which is an enormous change.