Some people argue higher taxes should be collected from industries causing higher than industrial pollution, whereas other argue there are better ways to deal it. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Individuals believe that environmental problems increase day by day. There are some solutions that people are believed in. Certain human being thinks factories which cause air pollution to obliged to pay money more than other firms. But for someone who does not true, they defend to make an agreement.

This

essay will discuss both views of the arguments in detail. On the

one

hand, decreasing pollution is crucial in recent decades. Countries take measures to reduce environmental impacts. The most common way for

this

is for governments to charge more fees from industries. If manufactories pay higher taxes, they give up polluting to provide sustainability. Collecting payment enables authorities to allocate

this

capital for precautions to eliminate pollution.

For instance

, a research and development centre can be established to investigate technologies to drop damages thanks to taxes.

On the other hand

, some people are persuaded that paying

further

fees leads to inequality among the manufacturers. If companies spend too much fund, they can raise their product price, and no

one

prefers their goods which leads to bankruptcy. Unfair pricing brings along to stoppage of production

as well as

unemployment goes up. Governments should focus on other solutions,

instead

of taking companies' cash, they should incentivize them to ensure that firms get precautionary measures.

To conclude

, there are two options and

one

of them is imposing higher tax on companies, another

one

variety of agreements to deal with

this

problem. In my opinion, unlikely the company spend too much fund, and governments should choose other alternatives. These selections can be the usage of filters on smoke holes, renewable energy, or different type of fuels.