Rich country often gives money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore developed country should give other types of help to the poorer countries rather than financial aid. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

Develop nations frequently provides aid to the third-world union in the

form

of

money

. In many ,cases wealth does not support the progress of these types of countries. So, it would be better to help them in other ways. I personally disagree with the financial support for the growth. Financial help often got wasted if it does not get used in a proper way by the government. For ,example during the war in Afghanistan, many societies contributed a huge amount of

money

for development, but even after the war conditions of the countrymen are unchanged. It

also

observed that

due to

mismanagement financial help can be used in the wrong way. The best example of

this

is terrorism. Terrorist groups always used that

money

which, is supposed to use for development.

Furthermore

,

instead

of offering , the fund they can provide help in the

form

of education, medical etc. Just because of the poor condition of many countries in Africa ,

continent

Add an article

a continent

show examples

so many nations provide help in the

form

of food and shelter for their locals. In many ,ways easy

money

can misguide the manpower of any country. It makes a habit for them

instead

of doing any type of productive work they seeks help from other and if they do not get

such

help they will start blaming the government.

To conclude

, helping in the

form

of

money

is not the only way for developing nations. Mismanagement of

money

by any higher authority can interrupt growth.

Money

help can even produce slow growth in some countries. Aids can be in any

form

; it can be in the

form

of education, medicine, food, shelter etc.