Successful sports professionals can earn a lot of more money than people in other important professions. Some people think that this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Nowadays, tempted by the substantial income figures of professional
sportsmen
, more and more people choose to pursue a career in
sports
.
While
some feel that
such
high pay that
sportsmen
receive creates a disbalance, I side with those who believe that
such
remuneration is fully deserved.
First,
it could be argued that
sports
do not represent a kind of activity
that is
of vital importance to society. Some people think that occupations that contribute most to the well-being and prosperity of humankind,
such
as doctors, firefighters and teachers, should be exclusively eligible for high income.
Consequently
, the great earnings of other professions that deal with entertainment,
for instance
, are thought to be unjustified and should be reduced.
Moreover
, it is sometimes claimed that activities demanding more mental than physical capacity should be better remunerated. One reason for
that is
that the former is considered to require more work and time to be honed, than the latter.
On the other hand
, personally, I believe that the big amount of money that
sportsmen
earn is well deserved.
First,
it is obvious that professional
sports
, which in turn are highly competitive, often result in substantial injuries to
sportsmen
.
Thus
, the high income is fully justified, because it allows them both to accept it as a kind of reward for potential traumas and to cover medical support if needed.
Secondly
, in my opinion, good
sportsmen
are an extremely rare breed, so, it naturally follows, that scarce ‘resources’ are usually expensive.
As a result
, I feel that
sportsmen
deserve to be paid a lot of money
due to
the exceptional mixture of their natural abilities and extensive training. In conclusion,
although
sports
are thought not to be of essential societal importance,
sportsmen
work equally hard and possess unique quintessence of qualities.
Therefore
, on balance, I firmly believe that they should receive substantial remuneration.
Submitted by vlad.chibisov on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • financial remuneration
  • exceptional
  • merit
  • talent
  • demand
  • entertainment value
  • career span
  • physical demands
  • justified
  • unfair
  • criticism
  • income inequality
  • societal priorities
  • sportsmanship
What to do next:
Look at other essays: