1. Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching with the technology available today, there is no justification for it, and everything should be online. To what extent do you agree or disagree? give your own opinion.

Engaging an ample number of
students
through traditional methods of teaching with all the available technology nowadays is not at all a cliché.Conventional methods of teaching never grow old even with advances in Artificial intelligence.I opine that the old way of teaching is not only effective but
also
rewarding. As we know,primitive
ways
of schooling are still going strong.The reason is quite obvious because they are not only effective but are equally rewarding for teachers and
students
.As physical presence counts,it not only gives professors control over
students
' academic outcomes but
also
aids in developing interpersonal bonds.
For instance
,physical classes inculcate fear in
students
to complete their assignments before the deadline and accelerate their result reports.In my point of view,giving lectures in the auditorium to an excessive number of
students
is an imperative measure for their
overall
grooming. On the flip side,with the advancement in technology,there are a variety of
ways
to help individuals improve their study level without compromising the money and time they spend to come to institutions and take classes physically.All the online applications are one click away preserving an individual's energy and time.To illustrate,during the covid time period,all the
students
were at ease because they could join the classroom with Zoom by just logging in.
As a consequence
,people not only became lazy but too much easygoing which adversely affected the outcomes.
Hence
,where automation brought incredible change it
also
has impacted the efficiency of learners. To recapitulate,In my opinion,old
ways
of teaching should be reinforced as they are not only beneficial but are
also
rewarding in different
ways
.Technology ,
however
,should be limited when it comes to teaching. As it can never substitute a competent teacher no matter what.
Therefore
, the notion of online teaching should not be entertained.
Submitted by kaswaahmed20 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: