Some people believe more actions can be taken to prevent crime, while others think that little can be done. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

There has been a large number of people who believe more

actions

can be done to prevent

crimes

,

while

others assume that no engagement will take place in preventing

crimes

.

This

essay displays the pros and cons of the motion.

Crimes

have increased over the years. It can be seen by numerous

actions

of their forms; robbery, genocide, money laundry, etc. Some people believe there are lists of

actions

that can be done to beat

this

violation.

Moreover

, they assume that

humans

can live peacefully in a utopia without any

actions

or

crimes

.

For instance

, If the government provides good maintenance, well-being (self-care service), and other developments it could assist to prevent the number of

crimes

to occur. In my opinion,

this

plan is surely possible. If the essential aspects of

humans

(Education, Social, Health, Development, etc) are fulfilled, the violation of

crimes

can be surely prevented.

On the other hand

, some

also

assume that

crime

is unlikely to be prevented. They believe it is human-nature behaviour to doing

crimes

. For real evidence,

humans

are greedy

that is

the reason why corruption, bribery, and financial

crimes

exist.

Moreover

, the government has a long journey to prevent

this

crime

. In my perspective, it is an unwise step to assume that

crime

can not be prevented. In conclusion, people who believe that violations of

crimes

can be prevented rely on how government provide decent aspects of life. They are assuming that

humans

can live in a world without any existing

crime

.

While

others believe that

crime

is natural and cannot be prevented even if the living aspects of

humans

are fulfilled.