It is often argued that protecting non-domestic animals is a disadvantage for our society because of all the necessities that they demand.
However
, I disagree with that statement about the importance of all the races in the world and how we can not exterminate them.
Linking Words
Firstly
, aminals who have not been domesticated by humans are usually called “wild”. Linking Words
Nevertheless
, we can not forget that Linking Words
that is
their nature, their existence has never meant to be among humans. As I said, we can not separate them for their origins, because they were never born to do whatever the human race wants. An example that can support my argument is an article written by the FIGARO, a French newspaper, that said that creatures are happier when they are in the wild because they feel freer rather than in a house or a closed space.
Linking Words
Secondly
, I believe that not protecting those beasts is a big mistake for our future because they are necessary to the food chain. Linking Words
Also
, many of these beasts are used for activities like hunting and if they disappear, Linking Words
this
hobby will Linking Words
also
disappear with it. Linking Words
For example
, a survey conducted by the University of Yale showed that in 2022, the percentage of people practising hunting had decreased since the number of wild animals had Linking Words
also
been reduced.
Linking Words
To conclude
, I agree with letting savage creatures live because they are crucial to our lives, and we can not forget that in the past, we were Linking Words
also
salvage creatures and we can not force them to be like us.Linking Words
santos_dij