Many cities are now turning parks and farmland into new housing developments. Is this a positive or negative development?

In many areas, fields and public parks are replaced by accommodation

buildings

.

Although

this

issue might cause a polluted

environment

, it can solve the problem of housing shortage in crowded

cities

. Those who argue

this

policy is negative point out its bad effects on the

environment

.

This

is because the introduction of new

buildings

exacerbates a huge amount of emissions, leading to pollution in the air.

Furthermore

, having more housing developments means having more migrated residents to these big

cities

simultaneously.

As a result

, the daily activities of citizens

also

contribute to bad effects on the

environment

such

as higher electric consumption.

For example

, since Da Lat City in Vietnam has become more well-known and has more construction sites, the temperature of the city has increased

5

Change preposition

by 5

show examples

Celsius degrees compared to 10 years ago. Despite

this

, I would argue that these

buildings

can help

people

when it comes to accommodation. Removing farmland and parks and constructing new dwelling developments can answer the question of lacking houses in many crowded

cities

. Because of the development of big

cities

,

people

have an inclination to migrate and settle in these areas, causing a shortage of living blocks.

Therefore

, the demand for new houses has been more urgent than ever.

For instance

, when

one-hectare

Correct article usage

a one-hectare

show examples

farming field makes way for housing

buildings

, it can solve the housing problems for more than 2000

people

in a rather large city. In conclusion, knocking down parks and fields and

then

creating new housing developments can make the

environment

become even worse.

However

,

this

policy brings viable solutions for

people

in terms of lacking houses in many crowded places.