some people believe tertiary education should be free, but some others say universities should chatge students. discuss both viwes and give your opinion.

It is said that
although
a group of individuals present the view that it is necessary for
universities
to charge
students
,
whereas
Correct word choice
apply
show examples
others are of the opinion that tertiary education should be free. I strongly agree with the former opinion. On the one hand, some
people
justifiably argue that charging
students
for
universities
leads to more studying with better quality, so they can pass their courses in a timely manner.
Otherwise
, they should pay tuition for each extra educational course which did not pass on time.
In addition
,
as a result
of not being free tuition for
universities
, the government can invest in the other part of development.
Due to
the fact that
universities
' expenditures are money consuming
such
as laboratory instruments and different facilities. They impose expenses on the government
then
emitting them provides opportunities for construction infrastructures.
On the other hand
, another group of
people
claim that
as a result
of free tertiary education, each person can
benefit
from
this
option. They insist that if it is not necessary to think about university tuition, the difference between rural and urban
students
is more likely would be emitted. So that it leads to equality in educational access. Another perceived
benefit
of not charging
universities
is that it gives rise to an increasing willingness among
people
to
benefit
from tertiary education.
As a result
of obtaining higher qualifications, better job opportunities would be proposed.
However
, in my view,
this
argument is not valid since most
people
can get a loan.
Furthermore
, they can
benefit
from other short-term placements in order to learn a job or get a promotion.
To conclude
, in my view, I completely believe
universities
should charge
students
. Because it helps the quality of the university grow a step ahead and controls money consumption for the government.
Submitted by kargar.mh1992 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Your essay presents a clear response to the task. However, it is advisable to further bolster your arguments with more specific and detailed examples. For example, you could mention particular countries or systems that have benefitted from charging students or providing free education.
task achievement
Ensure that your main points are sufficiently supported with clear and relevant examples. It gives the essay more depth and makes your arguments more compelling.
coherence cohesion
The logical flow of ideas is good, but sometimes your sentences could be more concise. Avoid repetition and aim for clarity to improve the overall coherence of the essay.
coherence cohesion
You have presented a clear introduction and conclusion which succinctly summarize your arguments.
coherence cohesion
Your essay maintains a logical structure, making it easy for the reader to follow your points.
task achievement
You've responded fully to the task and discussed both viewpoints clearly before presenting your opinion.
task achievement
Your ideas are generally clear and you have provided a balanced argument.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: