Large companies should pay higher salaries to CEOs and executives compared to other workers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many today have made a controversial debate that

executives

and CEOs should be paid higher incomes than others. I utterly disagree with

this

statement because every person altogether contributes to the success of a company and it might cause unfair feelings for employees. Those who believe

this

suggestion should be encouraged to point out its inequality.

This

is because when employers have lower earnings, they might feel that

higher position

Add a hyphen

higher-position

show examples

people are overpaid, and their hard work is useless.

Consequently

, it can result in bad effects on the relationship between

workers

and

executives

, which endangers the productivity of both.

For example

, Vin Group in Vietnam is paying a rather high salary for their CEOs, which is estimated to be about triple the amount of money compared to normal people.

As a result

, there was a demonstration of

workers

last

year in order to fight for more fairness. It should not be encouraged to pay a much higher wage for

executives

because everyone contributes to the success of a business equally.

This

means that a company can not achieve any accomplishments if it is in the absence of employee endeavour.

Furthermore

, there is no business can be established if they just have

executives

without any

workers

.

For instance

, every company in the world has a much higher number of employees,

while

they just have a few CEOs and

executives

.

To conclude

, I hold the belief that big businesses should not pay higher income to

executives

than other

workers

because it causes unfairness and everyone is equally working to achieve success.