Some people believe that car-free days are effective ways to reduce air pollution. However, others argue that there are other ways that are more effective. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Many today have made a controversial debate that prohibiting using

cars

is an optimal method to cut down the amount of

air

pollution

,

while

others think that there are other alternatives.

Although

this

problem can be solved by regulations of

governments

related to the industrial field, I believe that banning

cars

is an utterly viable solution. Those who argue that

air

pollution

can be capped by

governments

through industrial rules.

This

means that

besides

transportation, industrial manufacturers

also

contribute to

air

pollution

.

Therefore

, if

governments

intervene and issue stringent guidelines for the industrial fields, these industries will be more aware of environmentally-friendly issues.

For example

, since the government of Korea enforced the laws of using electric engines in producing goods, the number of gasses witnessed a significant decrease in the

last

5 years.

However

, car-free days would have a greater impact on

air

pollution

due to

its direct influences.

This

is because there is an extremely large number of vehicles on roads, which exacerbates harmful emissions directly into the

air

.

Therefore

, halting driving

cars

for a few days can reduce detrimental strains on the environment, and it is

also

an immediate solution that has results fastly.

For instance

, many Asian countries have capped their residents to use bikes

instead

of

cars

and motorbikes at weekends.

Hence

, the

air

pollution

problems have become better compared to the past.

To conclude

, though controlling

air

contamination can be done by the industrial rules of

governments

, I believe that stopping using

cars

several days a month is an effective measure to

this

problem.