The issue of reforming
school
curriculum in the educational system by dropping
courses
that are not concluded in STEM ( science, technology , engineering, maths) has sparked heated controversy, with the supporters maintaining that
school
juveniles should not be pressed by non-academic
subjects
and focus on crucial
courses
such
as chemistry , whilst the opponents claim that physical education, music and
art
play a vital role in the student's life. Personally, I support the latter opinion even though the former has some positive attributes.
First of all, it is often argued that the younger experience a hectic schedule in the
school
curriculum and need to be refreshed and alleviate stress in order to continue giving their best and they can achieve it only by participating in
art
subjects
such
as physical education. Indeed, it is vital important
students
exercise and get away from reality for a
while
otherwise
they will drive crazy and their performance will be submerged. It is clearly illustrated by recent scientific research which output that
students
who are not participating in non-academic
courses
tend to not pass with flying colours
than those who play an instrument or volleyball.
Another point in support of my opinion is that even though the majority of children pursue a career in science there are
also
students
who have an innate talent in music or
art
.
In particular
, being talented in playing guitar cannot be replaced by an academic subject
such
as maths or chemistry.
Therefore
, it is fair for them to have the opportunity to pursue their dreams and goals independently be it in academic or non-academic
subjects
.
However
, it is claimed that not only juveniles do not hit the books but
also
are exhausted after attending extracurricular activities. Admittedly,
students
have the tendency to overindulge once they participate in cookery, drawing.
For instance
, the aforementioned activities are challenging for them and
according to
a
school
's data in
the Correct article usage
show examples
North America
students
are less effective and are bored in STEM after their participation in non-academic
subjects
. Yet,
this
is not entirely true since children have a lot of energy and they can be bookworms
as well as
attending
art
or music classes simultaneously,
All things considered,
although Correct word choice
show examples
students
can't concentrate totally after attending non-academic
courses
. I firmly believe that undergraduates are able to do both academic and non-academic
subjects
and it is crucial either include to the syllabus. Only
then
do
students
strike a balance in their hectic
lifestyleFix the agreement mistake
show examples
and continue to enhance their skills spontaneously.