It is widely accepted that the English
language
is an integral part of our lives and its utility is on the rise. Some people believe that having
one
spoken
language
globally could not be beneficial for mankind,
whereas
others maintain the view that only the most usable
language
should keep preserved throughout the
world
. From my perspective,
this
issue is controversial and both positive and negative aspects need to be considered.
On the
one
hand, it could be argued that there are a great many advantages regarding the use of
one
language
in the
world
.
Firstly
, communication and interaction with other human beings would be effortless. Indeed, individuals will not need to learn a foreign
language
in order to travel abroad or to encounter people with different native languages.
For example
, students who decide to go to Erasmus will no afraid of misunderstandings and they will not hesitate to visit another place. What is more, speaking
one
specific
language
makes the population tolerant of discrimination for the reason that there will not exist idioms and accents in learning speech. Admittedly, if every individual needs to equip themselves only with
one
language
there will not be diversity,
consequently
, no
one
will judge anyone.
For instance
, in
this
day and present the majority of people tend to judge others
according to
the country in which they birth, their culture, or even their native
language
.
On the other hand
, opponents of
this
matter draw attention to the fact that
one
spoken
language
across the
world
may entail disadvantages.
One
problem that cannot be overlooked is that any country would have its own unique identity
as well as
globalization would be served on the table. To exemplify, it is vital that every part of the
world
has its own native accent, religion, and flag,
consequently
, the combination of the aforementioned makes the uniqueness of it.
For example
, tourists are keen on learning the history behind the place they visit
as well as
interacting with locals in order to learn using the foreign
language
, so it will be detrimental for them and they may lose their sparkle for
travelingChange the spelling
show examples
. Another negative aspect of
this
issue would be that life would be monotonous, anyone would have the opportunity to be bilingual.
In particular
, lots of individuals have a hobby to learn a foreign speech, so their life would be boring.
For instance
,
travelersChange the spelling
show examples
, journalists, and
publicCorrect article usage
show examples
whose job is associated with exploring other planets will lose their interest,
therefore
the meaning of life.
All things considered, I am convinced that speaking a particular dialect on earth can be advantageous considering the effortless interaction with other communities,
as well as
the reduction of marginalized other human beings,
however
, the loss of national identity of each country cannot be negligible or that some nations lose their hobbies or the goals of their job.