When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

In these contemporary times,

while

fields of technology have shown significant development, conventional methods have disappeared by them.

Therefore

there is an argument that whether previous skills and

ways

will remain. I completely agree with the opinion that it is difficult to continue using them.

To begin

with, I believe that it is fate that old fashions are beaten by new technologies because, historically speaking, the equipment which our ancestors

use

has evolved.

For instance

, primitive

people

used stones to light a fire, with modernization, we have become to

use

gases

instead

of them.

Furthermore

, citing more modern times, when it comes to making some documents,

people

used to

use

typewriters, but now keyboards are necessary in workplaces. The evolution of tools facilitates our tasks to save time and be efficient, and no one uses old technology because their demand is low in

people

.

Therefore

, it is true that we cannot help relying on using convenience tools. Once individuals know about useful

ways

, they could not come back to utilise previous

ways

.

For example

, there are one of the items humans should discard is atomic bombs.

Although

some countries understand that they have the potential of destroying the world, they have to keep retaining them as deterrence. In conclusion, I strongly consider that

people

cannot

use

previous

ways

because new technologies always provide us with more efficient methods.

Moreover

, even if outdated styles disappeared, humans cannot dump new technology.