The allocation of punishment for criminals has been a highly debated topic. Many intellectuals are in favour of fixed sentences for different crimes,
while
others believe that judicial systems should take into account all the elements of a Linking Words
crime
and sentence Use synonyms
accordingly
. Linking Words
This
article presents both perspectives and elaborates on mine.
Linking Words
Firstly
, the previous perspective places significant importance on pre-determined sentences for different criminal offences. Linking Words
This
optimistic view is leading to a lack of diversity in punishments. Linking Words
As a result
, the time-consuming judicial system will become more efficient, and the Linking Words
crime
rate will be suppressed to a great extent. Use synonyms
For example
, fixed penalties can help create a fair work environment, which would boost public trust in the law. Linking Words
Therefore
, by implementing a common policy for all criminals, the Linking Words
crime
rate will decrease.
Use synonyms
On the other hand
, the latter view paints a picture of the flexibility of the legislative system for various crimes. Linking Words
This
view focuses more on the seriousness of the Linking Words
crime
, and Use synonyms
therefore
, the criminal should be punished. Linking Words
In addition
, the circumstances and motives of the Linking Words
crime
scene are Use synonyms
also
considered in the judgment. Linking Words
Although
Linking Words
this
type of jurisdiction is time-consuming, it can save innocent people. Linking Words
For example
, a murder and an intentional assassination committed by a person in self-defence require different perspectives and punishments. Linking Words
Therefore
, dynamic laws can effectively mitigate potential crimes.
In summary, the sentence regarding criminal activity has a significant impact on criminal behaviour. In my opinion, the dynamic characteristics of the jurisdiction are more favourable for society to effectively curb criminal activity.Linking Words
2083749065