It's more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree？ Write an essay with no less than 250 words.

Some people believe that it is crucial for young kids to know about local happenings.

However

, others give importance to global

history

as it is considered more useful. Each and every

place

has its own unique

history

. In my opinion, I agree with the statement that local

history

should be taught to school

children

. I will propose a possible illustration for the same.

To begin

with, every

place

has its own series of

events

, and to preserve it,

children

should learn the

history

of the

place

.

History

can be altered and lost over a period of time. To prevent

such

mishappenings, it is necessary to encourage

children

to seek knowledge of the

place

.

For example

, some tribes have lost their

history

and origin, and now they don’t have a promising tale to tell. In all,

history

keeps the authenticity of the

place

intact.

Secondly

, it necessitates an emotional attachment to the land, which often helps

children

grow stronger.

In other words

, it entails a sense of patriotism for the

place

and binds the soul with the soil.

For instance

, people tend to die to protect their unique culture and heritage. They take pride in their

history

and want to pass these values on to their

children

.

To conclude

,

history

is more than just a factual representation of

events

; it is emotionally connected to people's lives.

Therefore

, it is essential for

children

to learn about the

events

that changed their ancestors' lives. It is the responsibility of both parents and the government to include these

events

in

children

's school books.