Introduction
In the present era, having atomic bombs is a debatable issue. Some societies argue that those technologies can be used to prevent global conflicts.
Nevertheless
, another group believes that a number of problems Linking Words
such
as clashes can happen when many states hold these weapons. In the following paragraphs, I will detail those paradigms and explain why the first notion is more logical.Linking Words
Body paragraph 1
To begin
with, when the main powers have radioactive warfare, they will keep away from direct conflicts. It happens because there is a notion that every party will be damaged massively when those destructive gadgets are used. Linking Words
Consequently
, after World War II ended, there were no massive wars which involved the main countries which own plutonium weapons. Linking Words
In other words
, these uranium artillery have prevented unnecessary conflicts among main powers. Linking Words
For example
, during the Cold War, the USA and Soviet Union were never involved in the same battlefields because they knew that their enemies had nuclear features.Linking Words
Body paragraph 2
Nevertheless
, future warfare can always happen if the owned nuclear nations use non-diplomatic ways to obliterate several problems among other states. Linking Words
For instance
, North Korea always releases a bunch of ultimatums to other states after they gained success in the nuclear weapon test. Linking Words
As a result
, global wars in the upcoming era cannot be obliterated when a number of countries always prefer to use militaristic approaches as a way to obliterate existing problems among them.Linking Words
Conclusion
In conclusion, I consider explaining that making a peaceful world can be achieved when nuclear technologies are owned by some superpowers based on the fact that there were no global wars after World War II.
Nevertheless
, there should be a regulation to control countries which owned those gadgets in order to prevent them from using these destructive weapons.Linking Words