There are two distinct notions in regard to the subject of classifying students in the current society, one is the belief that pupils should be separated based on their education performance and the other side argues that schools ought to equilibrium teach every student. Even though both parties have their own justifications, I firmly believe that the first option is superior.
On the one hand, the idea of educating all individuals together offers several benefits, notwithstanding the downsides that are going to overwhelm those advantages. It might help students to feel the state of equity
as well as
counter more perspectives in life considering everyone will study together. Despite that, each student has their own level of academic and comprehension. Linking Words
Therefore
, it is nearly impossible to find a mutual and suitable curriculum for all learners. Linking Words
For instance
, an average student does not have the ability to keep up with various esoteric pieces of knowledge, and vice versa.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, I wholeheartedly advocate the act of taking pupils' academic power into account in terms of classifying them. Everybody has unique talents, and by taking the aforementioned action, we are giving them an opportunity to maximise their potential. Linking Words
Consequently
, they will be given the most appropriate education milieu, surrounded by people who are their level, taught with the curriculum that suits them. Linking Words
For example
, a person with innate ability certainly is going to grow much more rapidly and significantly when they are in a gifted class than when they have to study in a standard environment.
In conclusion, I strongly approve of dividing individuals based on their educational ability. Teaching everyone all together is a decent alternative, Linking Words
however
, it still has a variety of flaws because of the fact that people's power of retention, understanding, logical thinking,etc is discrepant.Linking Words
kevindang020907