Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

In the modern world, globalisation is rapidly adopted in different

countries

.

People

have a myriad of views on whether we should share the findings or content with each other, some

people

may suggest that

this

is too vital or precious to share in a freeway.

Although

there are good arguments in favour of exchanging

information

variedly, I personally believe that we should uphold the valued

information

by ourselves. Of the reasons why some

people

think that it is a good way to share the

data

as much as possible, probably the most significant one is that

this

can enhance efficiency through the exchange of

data

and methods.

People

can cooperate with each other in solving difficulties. Tackling the pandemic is a prime example of

this

. Given that the different

countries

' experts had mutual meetings weekly in the United Nations, and they exchanged

data

and conditions of their

countries

related to Covid-19, which set up mutual guidelines and suggestions for the global. In

this

way, more precise decisions can be applied, and

thus

we passed through the pandemic now. Despite the above arguments, I believe that exchanging vital

information

will bring economic loss in business. Some of the

data

includes key elements of the business,

such

as the sales profit and the methods, and

this

kind of

data

should not spread to the competitor. Imagine that every restaurant has its secret recipe, the owner may test it thousands of times in order to create it. If the recipe is publicly disclosed, their customers may follow the recipe and cook by themselves and even their competitors will just copy their recipes for sale.

Therefore

, the restaurant is not unique among other restaurants anymore, it will in turn be a loss of earnings. Another significant drawback is the loss of intention to make inventions. As creating own ideas involve a range of processes, if the public can copy them from each other, they may not intend to go through those hard work again.

For instance

, medicines need long-term preparation and organisation,

such

as doing research, and animal and human testimonials. If

such

medical

data

is easily spread to other

countries

, pharmacy companies would not put too many resources into new inventions

due to

profit outweighing the cost. Under

this

line of thinking,

although

there are valid reasons for spreading the

data

and findings in the field of science, business and academia, I personally believe that some of the

information

is vital and valued, especially specialist

data

on inventions, should not be exchanged in use.