Governments give lots of support to artists, even though some people think it is a waste of money that could have been spent better elsewhere. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Some
people
think that the
government
should allocate funds for other essential
sectors
such
as health care, education, and technology. Others,
however
, believe that the artists' funding is worthwhile.
While
some
people
would argue that artists are well sponsored by governments because the
arts
also
provide economic benefits, I think that governments should invest in priority
sectors
because of resource limitations. On the one hand, some argue that the market will naturally support the
arts
and that
government
funding is not necessary. If
people
are willing to pay for a product or service,
then
it will be provided.
According to
a study by Americans for the
Arts
, the
arts
and culture industry generates 877 billion dollars in economic activity.
Therefore
, fashion, film, television, performing
arts
, publishing, and music—all of these creative industries and many more—are directly beneficial to our local and
overall
economies, or they can generate revenue on their own.
However
, I believe that the
government
should support funding in more priority
sectors
.
On the other hand
,
government
funding is limited, and funds allocated to the
arts
may be better used for other purposes
such
as healthcare, education, or infrastructure. Especially
due to
the rapid growth of the population, the world is in high need of technological development. It is required to increase the supply to meet the demand of the crowd, and investments in technologies help to innovate ways to increase the productivity of various
sectors
like food and manufacturing.
For example
, countries like China, the USA, and India are spending more on technology to balance their demand and supply and
also
on exports to gain profits from global markets. In conclusion,
although
some
people
think artists should be supported by the
government
,
this
industry can generate a lot of money by itself. So, funds allocated to the
arts
may be better used for other purposes because they are more important to the country's citizens.
Submitted by Jackfoot on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • government patronage
  • cultural heritage
  • national identity
  • creative industries
  • unnecessary expense
  • essential services
  • democratize
  • private patronage
  • market forces
  • innovation
  • boost tourism
  • subjective nature
  • allocated ineffectively
What to do next:
Look at other essays: