Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution; however, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

As many large cities around the world become increasingly crowded and polluted, applying

car-free

days

is an optimal method to mitigate

air

pollution. It is often claimed that the only viable solution to

this

crisis is, yet there are some people who suggest trying another way. In my opinion, there is no justification against developing

car-free

days

, since it is the best remedy. On the one hand, exhaust fumes from a volume of vehicles are the main-driven factor contributing to

air

pollution, outweighing any single industry. One of the reasons for

this

is emissions from cars contain a relatively high proportion of pollutants

such

as CO2,

also

other harmful gas.

Consequently

,

air

quality will worsen at an alarming rate as there is no stop sign for global warming. By having some

days

without cars on the road, no hazardous smoke will be released into the atmosphere.

This

policy would be extremely effective in big cities around the globe if

this

scheme applies in reality.

On the other hand

,

car-free

days

would have a greater impact on society, there are other methods that help to tackle the issue.

Firstly

, the local government has a leading role in encouraging residents to use public transport in lieu of private vehicles, as it produces a small number of pollutants and it is less likely to damage the

air

. More importantly, the authorities could create laws related to industries or factories,

such

as legislating strict controls on production numbers. It,

therefore

, limits the carbon emissions which can be utilised in production. In conclusion,

although

some people argue that it is

car-free

days

that would help to mitigate environmental abuse, I personally believe that it is better to consider other solutions to tackle the issues.