Many people think that painting and music do not directly improve the quality of people. Therefore, government should not spend too much money on artistic projects. Do you agree or disagree?
Despite that a great deal of progress has been achieved in the fields of fine
arts
and music, their importance in raising people’s
living standards has been questioned by some, and they insist that the government budget should be restricted to these two fields. From my perspective, this
view is hard to persuade.
The role of the arts
has long been underestimated. Those who believe that they are of no significance to the well-being of citizens have ignored the spiritual aspects of people’s
lives. While
it is true that the material parts are mainly pushed ahead by advances in sci-tech areas, folks in either traditional or modern society link much of their happiness closely with the arts
we have created for millenniums. Ancient people in the East and West, for instance
, decorated their houses with paintings made in ink or oil, in which they either embed
their wishes for a better life or Wrong verb form
embedded
satisfy
their pursuit of beauty. Modern ones relax by attending concerts where the melody from Mozart has been played over and over again. It is undoubted that, Wrong verb form
satisfied
therefore
, fine arts
and music also
play a necessary role in people’s
well-being and happiness.
Due to
the pivotal function of visual and audible art, the government should help develop them by allocating an adequate fiscal budget. Financial aid, in today’s world, is inevitable and indispensable for artistic projects that might otherwise
find it hard to survive and thrive. Our society has already put too much attention on programmes concerning scientific or technological innovations, leaving relatively few resources available for the artistic ones. State-owned artistic programmes have to wait, often for a long time, until they can receive the budget to operate; non-governmental or individual projects have to grow on more barren land, especially for smaller groups. These organisations lack effective ways to earn money in the competitive market where their rivals always outnumber the potential buyers, and thus
the funding from the authority is what they desperately demand.
In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the opinion that art forms such
as painting and music do not deserve recognition and enough financial assistance, for they matter a lot to improve people’s
spiritual life
and they would struggle to survive without government support.Fix the agreement mistake
lives
Submitted by zhaoruolin220 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task response
Ensure that your examples directly relate to the points you are making, and provide more specific and varied examples to support your ideas.
coherence cohesion
The essay has a clear logical structure and the ideas are well-supported. However, ensure that each paragraph is linked cohesively to the previous one to create a smooth transition.
lexical resource
Your vocabulary is strong and well-suited to the topic. Try to use a wider range of vocabulary to enhance your essay further.
grammatical range
Your grammar is generally accurate, but there are occasional errors. Work on using a wider range of complex structures to showcase your grammatical range.