Anyone can post information on the Internet.Some people say most of what we read on the Internet is inaccurate,To what extend do you agree or disagree?

In contemporary society,
due to
the development of social society, some
people
argue that most of the
information
we read on the Internet is false and misleading. From
this
viewpoint, I think whether or not the
information
can be believed by readers , depends on where the
information
comes from.
To begin
with, there is no doubt that individuals can submit a variety of things to different social media, including news , opinions , videos, pictures etc, which means that
people
get easy access to different
information
if they want. Unfortunately, in order to attract more attention, some
channels
' owners might fabricate false
information
to mislead
people
's thinking.
For instance
, a product manager who intends to increase the sales of his new product is more likely to create some fictitious story in the advertisement.
Furthermore
, if the product involves
people
's health, the worst result might cause very serious issues.
By contrast
, apart from these self-managed social media,
people
reading online can choose some reliable platforms.
This
news contributes to audiences gaining more comprehensive insights and understanding of social events.
For example
, some of the official
channels
on YouTube play an important role in our daily life, like BBC
channels
, CBC
channels
etc. Because the content of
this
news is mainly based on professional journalists' surveys and collecting
information
.
Hence
, compared to traditional TV programmes, it provides us with more
information
instantly and effectively from all over the world. It is important for individuals to choose better platforms with critical-thinking skills. In conclusion, I partly agree that a few of the
information
is incorrect indeed.
However
, most
information
from official
channels
and reliable influencers will be beneficial for our
life
Fix the agreement mistake
lives
show examples
, which can transform different perspectives and valuable ideas.
Submitted by guojingchang0426 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
The essay demonstrates a partial understanding of the task requirements and provides relevant examples to support the arguments. However, the response lacks clarity and does not fully address the prompt.
coherence and cohesion
The logical structure of the essay is somewhat developed, and there is an attempt to connect ideas. However, the coherence and cohesion could be improved with clearer topic sentences and logical progression of ideas.
lexical resource
The lexical resource is adequate, but there is a need for more varied vocabulary and precise word choices to enhance the quality of expression.
grammatical range
The essay displays some grammatical range, but there are errors in sentence structure and word usage that affect the overall clarity and accuracy of the language.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: