Some people believe that governments should have access to people’s mobile phone call records and messages for safety reasons. Others believe that this information is private and should not be available without permission. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

Nowadays, there is a debate about giving the authorities full permission to obtain information on people’s

phones

, the supporters argue that

this

is a way to improve risk prediction to protect society,

while

other populations consider

such

power will bring the end of privacy and freedom. in my opinion,

this

approach is acceptable only in very particular situations and

that is

what we are going to discuss in

this

essay. On the one hand, the people who support that government must have the right to know people’s

phones'

Change noun form

phones

show examples

data, believe that

this

access will help law enforcement against terrorist groups, by giving them the insight needed for preventing terrorists attacks and exposing the sleeping terrorist cells,

Moreover

,

this

procedure will allow law courts in discovering necessary

evidences

Change the wording

evidence

pieces of evidence

shreds of evidence

show examples

that solve major crimes like arms dealing and drugs trafficking.

For example

, in 2019 the Dutch police were able to destroy one of the most dangerous crime organisations in the Netherlands by hacking some of its members'

phones

.

On the other hand

, the opposite group, ar saying that

such

power could be used by dictatorships to control populations and hunt the political opposition.

Furthermore

, giving the administration full knowledge is going to destroy the fundamental bases of democracy and freedom.

For instance

, the British government scandal in 2011, when a police officer spied on his ex-girlfriend using police Radio. In my view,

although

this

kind of measure is very effective against terrorists and grand crimes

but

Remove the conjunction

apply

show examples

it should be performed only under high court observation to protect people's privacy and freedom, in conclusion, governments' access to people's

phones

should be monitored by legal figures.