Most of the urgent problems can only be solved with international cooperation.  To what extent do you agree or disagree？

The debate over whether international

cooperation

is an effective means of solving urgent

problems

has been long-standing.

While

some argue that global forces are the only solution to a wide range of challenges, I would contend that it depends on the issue at hand. As

this

urgent

problem

is relevant to the

country

itself,solving

this

problem

through domestic

cooperation

is a better choice.As we know,some bad social phenomena are caused by domestic

problems

.In

this

situation,internal people prefer to solve these

problems

by themselves.

For instance

,if a

country

's rate of crime keeps increasing in recent years,domestic people will require the government to make some crucial laws in relevant areas.When the government

asked

Wrong verb form

asks

show examples

for international help,

such

as in some violent ways,people may be unsatisfied with the government.

However

,as the urgent

problem

is relevant to the international

country

,it can be solved well with international

cooperation

.Because of the complexity of the

problem

,a good solution of it usually involves several countries.In some countries,the

problems

of drugs are really serious,leading to many social crimes,but it is difficult for the

country

itself to protect its citizens from being hurt.The drug may be produced in another

country

,and domestic law is useless for the producer.At that time,if these countries can make some international

cooperation

,the source of the drug will be destroyed. In conclusion, I believe that the need for international

cooperation

to solve urgent

problems

depends on the specifics of the issue.In some cases,

such

as drugs, international

cooperation

is the only way to solve

problems

.

However

, in other cases,

such

as the rate of crime, local efforts can be more effective.