Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than on university education.

Higher

education

is regarded as a measure of success and prestigious by many

people

,

while

others believe skills and vocational schooling are more practical. It is argued that the authority should fund more on extra skills learning

instead

of college educational institution

education

. I do not agree with the given statement and will discuss the same in

this

essay. 

Firstly

, there are numerous reasons why states should continue to provide adequate funding for academic

education

. It is required to build good labs, reading libraries, other infrastructures and manpower. Certainly, higher

education

helps students to have better opportunities and recognition at both domestic

as well as

international platforms.

For instance

, there are professions like doctors, engineers and other doctorate research that allow students to gain respect for themselves and their country.

Moreover

, a university

education

helps students to have confidence and prepares them to build a responsible society and

finally

a better country.

However

, an alternative set of thinking supports skill schooling and vocational training rather than university

education

.

According to

this

opinion, in practical life, more skilled and vocationally trained

people

are required in society.

For example

, electrician, plumber and other jobs demand are continuously increasing. If the government diverts its funds to

such

training

then

society in a few years will not face a present crisis of

such

trained

people

.

To sum up

,

people

debate that the government should spend more money on skilled and vocational institutions and not promote educational institution

education

. I do not agree with

this

opinion and as per the aforementioned reasons, strongly believe in continued funding to university

education

.