Some people argue that we should do research into their family history. Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations rather than the past history. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

There is a controversy that we should understand our family

history

while

other

people

think that we should pay attention to the current and future rather than the past events. In my opinion, both views are reasonable and I would like to discuss them. On the one hand, researching family and relatives'

history

can be a good thing for everyone to empathize with and be proud of family traditions.

For example

, the children could review the difficult times of their family or some heroic stories about the country's protection during wartime from their grandparents

then

they will appreciate their current peaceful lives.

Moreover

, understanding family

information

could help

people

be aware of the risks of family genetic diseases.

Therefore

,

people

can get advice from a doctor and have some intervention before facing the same serious health problems.

On the other hand

, in some cases, we should not dig into the family’s

history

but must focus on the current and future.

Firstly

, when

people

try to deeply understand the family's past,

this

may lead to detrimental

information

that they should not know or regret to know. The children may be shocked by the bad habits of their fathers

such

as stealing or violating which can drive them to the wrong mindset and illegal actions.

Moreover

,

this

will take time and resources for everyone to deep dive into the family’s stuck.

As a result

, the more

information

you figure out, the more effort you need to put into it but not all the

information

is always good things. In conclusion, I think that understanding family

history

may have both pros and cons that everyone should take into consideration when conducting

this

research.