some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that miney could be better spent elsewhere. To what extend do you agree with this view?

A government has to manage the finance of the country it is called to lead, investing money to the exclusive interest of its habitants.

Although

art plays an

importat

role in all the culture, influencing people's thoughts, inproving their sensitiveness, helping future generation to have more cretivity in live, it is evident that when the resources are limited politicians have to choose between what is essential and really useful for the satisfations of the basic needs, and what,

instead

, has only a secondary importance. It's undisputed that health, education, job opportunities, transport are the most

importat

requests that people require to be satisfacted. In those fields any restrictions are allowed: everybody needs to be able to cure himself in case of necessity, education is crucial in terms of better job opportunities and economic initiative, jobs opportunities, and creating the conditions for them with appropriates trainings, the only

importat

thingh in term of changes to enter in the world of work.

Lastly

transport is essential in term of travels inside a country or between countries: not only for tourism, but

also

for student e workers. Evidently in

this

scenario there is not place for money invested in less

importat

things like art: when economic availabilitied are limited basic need have the priority. Just in case of unlimited resoces governments can spend the money olso for art.