Some think most crime is the result of circumstances, eg., poverty and other social problems. Other believe that most crime is caused by people who are bad by nature. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Whether

criminals

are a result contributed by numerous social factors or their own characteristics is an often-debated point.

While

I contend that social status leads to moral degradation and direct circumstances force offenders to be illegal, some critics suggest certain

people

have distinctive traits that can hardly be reshaped. It is prominent that delinquency comes

as a result

of ethical degradation, which stems from the social status of offenders.

This

is to say, most

people

in lower castes of the social ladder usually encounter reprobates and social

problems

like drugs and prostitution.

This

guides them into a downward spiral of morality without proper intuition to lead them out, and committing a crime is the ultimate end of it. Rehabilitation centres are renowned for their ability to reform crime offenders,

however

, their jobs are simply to educate

ethics

Replace the word

ethical

show examples

to

Change preposition

apply

show examples

criminals

, which surprisingly they never really get informed about,

further

indicating the ongoing issue concerning the downward spiral.

Nevertheless

,

people

justifying the idea of

criminals

being bad by nature suggest individuals have specific personalities and sets of behaviours unique to any other. To break it down, if

people

are naturally born to be bad,

this

will progress into detrimental behaviours later on.

This

personality cannot be shaped,

thus

, leading to possible crime offences.

While

this

point has validity, it has underacknowledged the role of education. If properly educated, a person can still know the foundations of moral behaviour and will be able to impede their own characteristics so as to be citizens of society. In my viewpoint, most

people

commit crimes because they are forced to. A lot of criminal cases suggest the reason behind

this

is social

problems

directly relating to their lives, like poverty or tension. At the time of the offence,

however

good they are as a person, their morality simply got overforced by the

problems

, which they failed to impede.

Hence

,

this

writer is swayed by social

problems

. In retrospect,

while

critics argue personalities cannot be reshaped, proponents including myself suggest moral degradation, foundations, and forced actions advocate the role of social

problems

in driving

criminals

into illegal activities.

Hence

,

this

essay should have proven that

people

commit crimes not by nature but from social influence.