Some people claim that it is immoral to exploit animals, and that the government should prohibit using animals for scientific research. In the meantime, others argue that exploiting animals is crucial for allowing scientists to learn more about human biology and health. Discuss both views and give your opinion
It is considered by individuals that the government should forbid scientific
research
for using animals
as an object since it is the same as exploitation which can be stated as an immoral attitude. Meanwhile, there are others who claim that animals
are vital objects for scientists to learn more about biology and health. The following essay will discuss both these points of view and argue in favour of the former.
On the one hand, some people argue that the governments should ban the experiments that are using animals
. In fact, the public in several nations has created campaigns to stop animal exploitation in research
in the United Kingdom, there was a campaign to boycott cosmetic industries, that are using animals
for testers before continuing mass production. However
, it is an unethical experiment because animals
can get hurt and even killed due to
the chemical substances. Therefore
, the government’s role is needed to solve this
issue such
as creating a regulation of the standard operation procedure for scientific research
.
On the other hand
, other individuals argue that animals
have a crucial role in scientific research
. In general, scientists use animals
for health studies and biology. Undoubtedly, the use of animals
can give several benefits to humans in the experiments. To illustrate, in the case of health, when researchers discover new medicines, they need to test the drugs first to find out the side effects. Nevertheless
, it is a big risk if the drug is tested on humans. Therefore
, animals
are used to do that. The important thing about using animals
in research
is scientists need to take care of their habitat by selecting the animals
based on criteria such
as choosing males instead
of females which have a responsibility to continue breeding.
In conclusion, it is understandable that is
immoral to use animals
as a part of research
. However
, I believe animals
are vital objects for scientific experiments as long as they are still managing animals
’ habitats by selecting them appropriately.Submitted by zakiyaartanti19 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Content
The essay is well-organized and covers both sides of the argument. However, there is room for improvement in the overall flow and coherence of arguments. Consider developing your points more extensively to enhance their clarity.
Grammar
Some sentences contain minor grammatical errors or awkward phrasing. Reviews your sentences to ensure that they are grammatically correct and that your meaning is clear.
Word Choice
The usage of 'object' to refer to animals seems inappropriate. Animals are living beings, not inanimate objects. Consider revising your language.
Argument Development
In the conclusion, you may clearly summarise each side of the argument before giving your final opinion. This would make your final position more clear and convincing.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?