It is a contentious issue whether specific skills can be taught without any
talent
or not. Some say anyone can become a pro through practice. Others think it is a waste of kids' time because those who inherited predispositions will always win. In Use synonyms
this
essay, I will elaborate on both points of view and explain why I believe both are true.
Linking Words
To begin
with, certainly, being a talented child helps. It is easier for Linking Words
such
a kid to see stuff others do not notice. Linking Words
For example
, to view important details on the painting. It is not only something that speeds up developmentLinking Words
,
but Remove the comma
apply
also
motivates surrounding to invest in that kid. Namely, teachers may encourage them to join additional classes Linking Words
while
average kids do not get similar proposals. Linking Words
Therefore
, they are getting an advantage from a very young age.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, hard work creates the best masters. It is crucial to spend hours studying and training rather than believing that Linking Words
talent
is enough to succeed. Use synonyms
For example
, attending additional classes and challenging yourself with the competition. Because Linking Words
talent
brings self-confidence, many of them fail to be patient and practice their skills. Use synonyms
Consequently
, less gifted end up having better results because of determination. Namely, If a musician does not play, it will not develop sufficiently.
Linking Words
To conclude
, Linking Words
while
some argue whether Linking Words
talent
is better than regular training; personally, I believe we need both. Those are two factors that will make a genus in the field because exclusively one will be always not sufficient.Use synonyms
Aga