Both government investment in public transport systems and reductions in public transport ticket prices will help to reduce transport pollution greatly. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In the past decades, society members often preferred to use their private vehicles which has caused a great amount of air
pollution
in a number of countries. Some argue that governments should invest more in public transportation systems and decrease
ticket
prices in order to reduce
pollution
, which I do agree with. Nowadays, a myriad of people are complaining about the frequency of buses and subways during the day. If they lose their desired one, they should wait for a long time to catch the next one,
consequently
, they prefer to use their own automobiles as
cars
are more predictable.
Moreover
, numerous individuals are not happy with the quality of public transportation vehicles' chairs. These chairs may be serviced once a year;
as a result
, they are deprived of quality and people are uncomfortable with them. It is likely that these issues have happened
as a consequence
of insufficient budgets for repairs.
Furthermore
, the crisis in the past years has resulted in increasing
ticket
prices;
therefore
, a vast majority of the population is using their automobiles because they find them far more reasonable.
For instance
, in the UK after doubling the subway
ticket
fee in 2017, the amount of traffic congestion massively increased.
Cars
' engines work mostly based on fossil fuels, and their fume emissions
such
as CO2 pollute the atmosphere. The more
cars
are driven in the streets, the more air
pollution
will happen.
On the contrary
, public transport systems carry a great number of individuals, so
this
can help reduce the number of private
cars
. In conclusion,
although
public transport systems are deteriorated in services, they can be useful in transport
pollution
reduction. I believe that authorities ought to improve
this
system by not only investing more in that part but
also
decreasing the
ticket
prices.
Submitted by g.bohlouli96 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Cohesion
To improve your essay, try to use a wider range of cohesive devices to link ideas more fluidly and make your argument even clearer. While you've used transition words effectively, experimenting with more complex language structures could enhance the coherence of your argument.
Task Response
In the introduction, clearly state your position regarding the statement to immediately provide a clear direction for your argument. This practice strengthens the impact of your essay from the beginning.
Task Achievement
You provided relevant examples and comprehensive ideas to support your argument, which enhances the effectiveness of your essay.
Coherence
The logical structure of your essay, including the presence of both an introduction and a conclusion that encapsulate your main points, positively contributes to its overall coherence and cohesion.
Task Achievement
You adeptly supported your main points with specific examples, such as the increase in traffic congestion in the UK after the subway ticket fee doubled. This specificity adds substantial strength to your argument.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • sustainable transport
  • carbon footprint
  • mass transit
  • subsidization
  • fare reduction
  • environmental impact
  • urban planning
  • public policy
  • commuter behavior
  • infrastructural development
  • economic efficiency
  • equitable access
  • lifestyle shift
  • congestion
What to do next:
Look at other essays: