Over the past decade, Indian parents have encouraged their children to study in privately owned schools over state institutions.
Thus
, they argue that Linking Words
such
families are not obliged to pay any levies for public schools. I agree with the statement for the reasons described in the upcoming paragraphs.
Linking Words
First,
we need to understand why families think Linking Words
this
way. The main idea behind Linking Words
this
thought could be the 'trust' in the politicians and the authority system. The taxpayers believe that their wealth was and will be wasted on the development of the educational structure and facilities. To illustrate, government-run systems lag far behind private ones in the spheres of infrastructure, education, and even hygiene or cleanliness.
Another reason for supporting the notion must be the increase in the financial burden on them. Linking Words
In other words
, when people send their offspring to private institutions, they are expected to pay an exorbitant amount of capital to them. To add on, there are many other extra expenses to pay in these systems. Linking Words
For example
, picnic fees, funds for cultural activities, and so on, force them to dig a hole in their pockets to let their children participate in these activities. So, Linking Words
at the end
of the day, they are likely to consider not supporting the government education system with their hard-earned salaries.
Linking Words
To conclude
Linking Words
this
topic, the elected regime should increase its focus on developing better schools to rely on. Linking Words
As a result
, parents will Linking Words
also
send their children there without any worries. And eventually, they will Linking Words
also
end up paying taxes for the betterment of the government-run education systems.Linking Words
er.lerulal