In many countries, imprisonment is the most common solution to crime. However, some people believe that better education will be effective solution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is widely considered that incarcerating criminals serves as an effective penal system for criminality,

while

others argue that high-quality education systems are better at tackling crime. I strongly support the former notion and firmly believe that enforcing sanctions brings about more positive societal impacts. On the one hand, a well-regarded schooling system plays a vital preventative role by breaking the intergeneration cycle of crime. When individuals have an opportunity to access quality education in a supportive environment, it equips them with knowledge and values to resist criminal influences.

For example

, well-educated populations like Singaporeans are more able to think critically and make informed choices, resulting in a low rate of illegal actions and antisocial behaviour.

This

approach effectively reduces the chances of engaging in illegal acts

due to

manipulation or lack of social awareness.

On the other hand

,

while

formal learning is important in combating crime, I am greatly convinced that prison sentences represent a superior remedy for those who participated in criminal actions.

This

practice ultimately protects society and maintains public confidence. Imprisonment not only ensures that those who have committed crimes face appropriate consequences but

also

fosters a sense of security and faith in the justice system.

For instance

, when high-profile offenders are subjected to sanctions, it provides closure for victims and their families

as well as

simultaneously reinforcing public trust in the fairness of the legal framework. In conclusion,

although

the significant role of reputed schooling systems in deterring criminals is crucial, I am of the opinion that prison terms are a more effective solution to manage the level of criminality.