Both government investment in public transport systems and reductions in public transport ticket prices will help to reduce transport pollution greatly. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
I think that investment in public transportation by the state, keeping fares as minimum as possible will greatly help reduce vehicular emissions, because a well-executed government intervention towards improving reliability and accessibility in public transport can lead to citizens’ attraction towards public
vehicles
, greatly reducing the number of carbon-emitting private ones, as discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.
Firstly
, the more the government invests, the better the infrastructures of mobility will be established. If the investments are directed not only towards purchasing
vehicles
but
also
to bettering their quality
such
as making them more clean, comfortable, efficient and accessible to
people
with disabilities, a larger segment of
people
will find themselves stepping into them.
For instance
, when the Kathmandu Metropolitan introduced cutting-edge 'Express Busses' plying on designated lanes, many
people
reported that they left their private
vehicles
at home, as express busses were convenient, and helped them reach destinations on time.
Moreover
, public transport will be more attractive if they are operated at affordable rates. It is evident that increasing fuel prices have left a huge dent in the pockets of private owners, so it is natural for
people
to get inclined to cheaper alternatives provided that they are equally comfortable and efficient as private ones, hugely reducing the number of carbon-emitting
vehicles
plying on the road. A survey by Kantipur Television for its 'Janamat' programme, showing that 75% of respondents would have never considered buying private
vehicles
if public ones had been well-managed and efficient, serves as a compelling illustration of how eager the general public is to transit to public transportation. In conclusion, I concur with the fact that the vehicular carbon footprint can be significantly reduced if the government invests to make public transportation more reliable and affordable, as a huge segment of inflation-burned petrol and diesel engine users will be shifting their gears towards them.
Submitted by swikritishrestha90 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • sustainable transport
  • carbon footprint
  • mass transit
  • subsidization
  • fare reduction
  • environmental impact
  • urban planning
  • public policy
  • commuter behavior
  • infrastructural development
  • economic efficiency
  • equitable access
  • lifestyle shift
  • congestion
What to do next:
Look at other essays: