The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 avout one university. Summarise the information and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about aspects of the university.

Overall

Linking Words

, students had given the lowest

point

Use synonyms

in technical quality,

print

Use synonyms

resources

Use synonyms

, and electric

resources

Use synonyms

in 2000,

Linking Words

however

Add a comma

however,

show examples

the rest of

years

Correct article usage

the years

show examples

they

have shown

Wrong verb form

showed

show examples

good points.

On the contrary

Linking Words

, the

range

Use synonyms

of

modules

Use synonyms

offered has shown a decrease mark. In terms of rating, the

range

Use synonyms

of

modules

Use synonyms

offered had the lowest

point

Use synonyms

at 32 in 2000,

however

Linking Words

, the

print

Use synonyms

resources

Use synonyms

have shown the highest

point

Use synonyms

at 87 in the same

year

Use synonyms

. The same thing happened in 2005, the

range

Use synonyms

of

modules

Use synonyms

offered again showed the lowest

point

Use synonyms

at 30, and

print

Use synonyms

resources

Use synonyms

have shown

Wrong verb form

showed

show examples

a peak mark. The technical quality has been given an

overall

Linking Words

score of approximately 66 every

year

Use synonyms

. In the

last

Linking Words

year

Use synonyms

, the

print

Use synonyms

resources

Use synonyms

and the electric

resources

Use synonyms

have shown an apex score of 88 and the

print

Use synonyms

resources

Use synonyms

have the best rate every

year

Use synonyms

. The

range

Use synonyms

of new

modules

Use synonyms

anew

Rephrase

apply

show examples

has a minimum rate. Building or teaching facilities have shown stable scores.