spending money for protecting species is awaste money by some, do you agree or disagree
For the
last
two or three decades, there has been a big debate on the topic whether
is it beneficial to save Change preposition
of whether
animals
. Some folks believe spending money on them is not significant while
others are opposed to it. However
, I agree with the given statement due to
several possible reasons such
as maintaining the ecosystem
and economic benefits and the following paragraphs will expatiate both stances with lucid examples.
To commence with, the foremost reason to agree is protecting animals
can be beneficial for economic growth which means millions of people are visiting to see them. For example
, in India, a zoo named, world zoo
is one of the best tourist destinations which boosts the economy of the nation. Correct your spelling
World Zoo
Secondly
, it is not helpful only for ecotourism but also
for maintaining the ecosystem
. To explain further
, certain species are helping to maintain ecosystem
balance which means excessive animals
can be dangerous for human beings. For instance
, the number of rabbits inclined in the fields of Haryana after diminishing one of the categories of wolves which affects not only the health of the individuals but also
the food resources due to
damaging of fields.
On the other side, a few people thought the extinction of these species was more beneficial than keeping them. Firstly
, the government should spend money on another
important Correct quantifier usage
other
thing
Fix the agreement mistake
things
such
as global warming. To give a clear example, millions of dollars are spent to maintain the zoo, indeed, food, shelter and temperature for these animals
which can be used for another significant purpose. Secondly
, the number would be diminished by their own as it is a natural process such
as the extinction of dinosaurs.
To illustrate, the majority of polar bears died with the melting of glaciers due to
a lack of temperature adaptation. Hence
, there is no need to spend expenses on them.
To conclude
, spending revenues on the
Correct article usage
apply
animals
is a debatable topic, nowadays. Some believe that this
idea is not worth it because the government should focus on other things such
as global warming while
others opine that it could be beneficial for the country in different ways like ecotourism and ecosystem
balance. However
, in my point of view, spending money would be useful for the country as well as
the community.Submitted by buttargurpinder73 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.