The best way to solve environmental problems is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Many

people

believe that increasing the price of fuel is an efficient way to cope with environmental problems.

However

, I firmly opine that there would be a detrimental impact on daily wage earners rather than a prosperous population, which will be discussed in the following paragraphs. The first and foremost argument is that having an increment in the

prices

of crude commodities

such

as oil, and gas might cause a number of serious problems that a plethora of

people

can not deal with. What is more, even though the

prices

have been rising for a period,

for example

, one year, a throng of

people

who are called elite would still continue to afford them.

For example

, the statistics that are conducted by the government of the USA show that despite firm increases in diesel, the rate of consumption was still steady over the 10 years and rich

people

eclipsed the indigent ones by buying fuels.

On the other hand

, governments should urge

people

cleaner and green alternatives to solve the world’s environmental pollution problem

instead

of having firm regulations about the

prices

. Admittedly, spurring the electric automobiles and increasing usage of solar energy is a boon for either ministries or civilians as it is cheaper and renewable.

For instance

, China has signed a contract that was about manufacturing electric automobiles

while

creating adequate companies and urging

people

to them with remaining

prices

.

To conclude

, despite having several voices from the affirmatives, increasing the

prices

is not an effective notion to solve the threats to our nature, which is shown in the discussions. I highly recommend to use to substituting fossil fuels with cleaner options

while

allocating subsidies globally.